9/11 Holographic Experience “Made For Television”
Albany, New York — Those in the truth-seeking community believes television influences our judgement of reality beyond repair. Many Americans saw holographic experiences “made for television”. Many believed this theory outlandish. Hologram investigators looked into the theory as interesting. This theory, considered as the “No Plane Theory”, claims cigar-shaped missiles surrounded by a series of holograph machines projecting planes. In this theory, no hijackers existed. As for the victims who died that day, they “were all actors. How many people do you know would call their relatives and use their full names? Why wouldn’t he say “this is me”? This isn’t human behavior, certainly not good acting.” Many people believe this theory too cynical to consider.
“What happened on September 11 2001 in New York? This is one of those attacks you would never see coming. You would never know to look up and see cigar-shaped missile. Especially not the orbital projectors. And even if you did manage to see the missiles and projectiles, you could never replay your memory to major television stations. TV has a way of second-guessing you if you let it. Such as, how many planes were in 9/11?” “One of the reasons why we only have nineteen seconds of choppy footage from the Pentagon surveillance video. They couldn’t have gotten the imaging right from the orbitals to make it look convincing. It’s hard to see, but one definitely can’t make out any wings. It looked like a missile hit building.” Others believe the special effects solely located to television, without the use of orbitals. “However, if this were the case, how did amateur videos capture the footage of the planes?” Sources say amateur video were also taken by operatives, confiscated and reworked with the imagine enhancing effects.
Still, conspiracy theorists have a more balanced theory to the planes. “The hologram theory violates Occam’s Razor, which states “don’t multiply entities beyond necessity”, or “the simplest answer is the best”. A far more reasonable explanation is the planes were drones, remote-controlled plane to crash into the Towers. We know planes can controlled from their main towers if a hijacking occurred. This way, you wouldn’t have to worry about pulling off an impossible flight maneuver. Perhaps the main control stations were “hijacked”, by friendlies. In other words, “keep it simple, stupid”.
Evidence for this theory includes text from Operation Northwoods, outlining a terrorist plan to propel American into war with Cuba during the 1960s: “An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.”
“Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the United States what has happened to the aircraft instead of the United States trying to “sell” the incident.”